🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that a lack of decision over how to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

Local authorities have singled out three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least part of one graveyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen far earlier. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His parent said she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families are calling for more sea defences to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to decide the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.